![]() |
|
|
||
|
| Natural
Science as a tranquility- Pillow-Science for retired People?
On credibility of Agro-genetic engineering and "Biosafety" scientists. Though Immanuel Kant (1724-1804) is already dead for some time, people refer to him always again and therewith dominate also the representatives of the so-called "tranquility-pillow-kantianism" (FAZ) today as well as to Hegel's time widely the field. What does it mean? "with horror Hegel persued, how Kant's philosophy served as a pillow for the inactivity of thinking, as if already all were proved and being over and done with" (FAZ). A cause to get excited? No, not necessarily; we don't live in "Kant's world" in which one could prove with a "Kritik der reinen Vernunft (critizism of pure reason)", that there isn't any knowledge possible of the thing in itself . Heinrich Heine (1797-1856) had still assumed, Kant has postulated God not only because of his butler Mr. Lampe, but above all because of the police. Be that as it may, who is today still impressed by the seal "proved by Kant"? Today people seem to be more impressed by seals like "proved by FDA, EFSA ", or " proved by 'independant' Biosafety - and Agro-genetic engineering scientists" - although environmental risks of genetically modified plants are not under control. By scandals in Agro-genetic engineering (or you better speak of "chronique scandaleuse" in this sector), ISAAA- or biosafety-swindle and scientific falsifications of a clone scientist, credibility in that kind of science is beginning to vanish completely. You just need to look at the facts regarding genetically modified crops. More ... Further reading: Science
Review Letters
|
Knowledge
and Nature
All knowledge begins
at least since Plato and Aristotle with the astonishing and only who goes
out from being astonished, is on the way to accurate knowledge. a knowledge
without soul is no more than an intellectual knowledge outside reality.
Also, if the scientist feels himself not in harmony with natural processes
of the world and does not consider himself to be actually only a part of
the world developement, he probably doesn't find the way to an actually
reproductive knowledge.
Further reading: Science
Review Letters
|
||||||
| Nature
as an exploitation Object, or as a Standard? Learn more on climate protection
and how to save bee colonies
If the speech is of the living nature,
of farming, beekeeping, manifold landscape,
medical
science , only that science has success in the long run, which targets
a domestication of the nature. Each manipulation by application of force,
as the genetic modification in agriculture,
will always result in only short timed success and suffer heavy setbacks
(see also Apicultural
Review Letters) - as nobody can meanwhile oversee the negative side-effects
of Agro-Biotechnology. The hunger in the world will be increased by Agro-genetic
engineering - a fact which is often being overseen. Required are new
strategies in agriculture and beekeeping. Our expert team works together
with farmer- and beekeepers associations who founded a GMO-free zone or
governments of countries and federal states, who have banned GMOs from
their country; they are listed in our directory for GMO free companies,
countries and federal states and receive support by our expert centres.
Learn more on climate protection and how to save
bee colonies. More...
|
Satire
against the establishment in natural science
Doesn’t happen anything
ridiculous in the world? Is it so ridiculous to think of something absurd
happening? For instance in beescience and -practice, genetic engineering
in agriculture? More ... |
||||||